Monday, April 26, 2010

For Class April 29

Thursday you will work on the reflective writing to introduce your portfolio. This is the last class I will be available for workshopping. If you have any remaining questions about how to organize your portfolio, look at the sample portfolio (https://sites.google.com/a/kean.edu/chandler_eng2020/) and if you are still confused - make sure to ask me in class.

Your portfolio will be due at the end of class on Monday, May 3.

Reflective writing for introduction:
On the introduction page of your portfolio, write an essay in which you answer the questions listed below. Unlike the reflections on the resumes and the analysis of your writing samples – this piece needs to be an essay. It should have a focus, and you should use examples from your portfolio to develop that focus. Overall, this focus should develop a discussion of the following points.

1. What did you learn about writing in this course? Include reflections on what you learned from the readings, and what you learned from the writing assignments. You might include reflections on what you learned about writing process (pre-writing, drafting & revising); different forms for academic writing; rhetorical analysis (how audience & purpose influence the form of your writing), or writing for particular audiences. Pay particular attention to information or practices that were "new" and helpful.

2. How have you improved or grown as a writer? Which assignments / activities do you feel were most important to making you a better writer? Use references to work in your portfolio as examples.

3. What do you feel you still need to work on? Use examples from your portfolio to support your discussion.


Grades: I will grade your portfolios & send your final gradesvia email by Wednesday, May 5. When you receive your grade, if you feel I have made a mistake - either in the math or in evaluating your work - send me an email so we can come to a fair agreement. You need to be in touch with me before May 10. On May 11, if I have not heard from you, I will enter the grade sent via email into Keanwise. If you have any questions, ask me in class.

See you Thursday!

Class April 26: Reflective Writing for Portfolio

Post a discussion of the following points on the introductory pages for the Resumes and for the Writing Samples. You are not required to create a smooth-flowing essay for this writing, but you do need to demonstrate some in-depth thinking in response to each of the questions.

Rhetorical analysis of the general resume:
Who is the audience for the general resume? What purposes do you intend to use it for?
Describe how and why you think the particular headings, organization and content will work for the audience and purpose you have identified.
On a scale of 1-10, rank how you think your resume will compare to those of other applicants. What do you think is your greatest strength? What do you think is your biggest drawback?
Are there any changes you anticipate making before you actually send it out?

Rhetorical analysis of the particular resume:
Who is the audience for the particular/dream resume? What purposes do you intend to use it for?
Describe how and why you think the particular headings, organization and content will work with the audience you have identified.
On a scale of 1-10, rank how you think your resume will compare to those of other applicants. What do you think is your greatest strength? What do you think is your biggest drawback?
Are there any changes you anticipate making before you actually send it out?

Rhetorical Analysis for Writing Samples:
Who is the intended audience for these writing samples? What are the expectations of that audience? What in particular about the pieces will interest this audience and why?
What is the purpose of each writing sample? How well does each writing sample meet your intended purpose?
For each sample, describe what the audience will learn about you (name specific abilities, skills, accomplishments, aspects of who you are). Do these features correspond to the audience & purpose identified in the first two questions? If not, what do you need to work on?
How well do your samples represent the range of your abilities (all the different things you can do relevant to your purpose)?
How well do your samples represent you as a writer?
Anything else you would like to work on?

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Class April 22

Matt and Brian gave their presentations today (thank you).

We then spent the rest of the class working on your writing samples + catching up with posts to the Blog. I invited you to create posts for:
Blog 22: Short writing samples, and
Blog 23: Long writing samples.

I will be looking over Blogs 21-23 today and tomorrow. Work not posted by Friday morning, we can talk over in class - but you won't get feedback/credit from the Blog.

In class on Monday we will start on the reflective writing. I will give you the prompts for creating the reflection on your resumes. We will also work on any remaining issues associated with posting your work to your portfolio.

On Monday we will also finish up presentions and continue working on writing samples, and the portfolio.

Good class today, and have a great weekend.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Class April 19

Walmbe and Michelled gave their presentations (thank you). And the rest of the class was a workshop. We talked as a group briefly about what you plan to use for your writing samples, and I worked with some of you one-on-one to set up your portfolios + revise your work. It will be more of the same on Wednesday.

See April 15 for an overview of the rest of the term.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Class April 15

In class today Lana and Andrea gave their presentations on being an ESL pre-K & elementary teacher, and on being a nurse practitioner.

We then looked at some sample personal statements and talked about how to write a strong personal statement. We had a brief discussion of how you might apply what you learned from reviewing the samples to your work - and almost had a workshop - but we ran out of time.

For the rest of the term: You will be working on the writing samples for your portfolio. We will have presentations (as per the schedule) and open workshops on April 19, 22, and 26. On April 28 you will get started on the reflective writing - in class. You will then finish your reflections & polish the pieces in your portfolio to hand in on Monday, May 3.

For your writing samples, you may use pieces you have developed for other classes, or you can write samples specifically for your portfolio. The object is for you to present "evidence" of the kinds of writing you can do. Your portfolio will be particular effective if these samples are relevant to your profession.

I will be available in the writing center and in class to help you plan and polish your work.

Have a good weekend and see you Monday.

Personal statement workshop

Samples Personal Statements: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/642/02/

Before you begin discussing your personal statement - tell your reviewer who you will submit this statement to. If possible, go to a website that has information about your reader.

As you work on your statement - keep in mind what the employer/institution/program officer will be looking for.

What is the overall organization of this statement? (What points does it address and in what order?)

State how the organization of this personal statement connect to or reflect the agenda/mission/objectives of the institution/program/or employers who will read it? What needs to be re-arranged? What needs to be added? Deleted?

Which points can be made more relevant or more powerful?

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

What we did in class April 12

Karilyn and Aydin gave presentations on their professions, we talked over your indtroductory letters, and set you up to get started on your personal statement.

In class Thursday, Lana & Andrea will give their presentations. Then we will go over some sample personal statements and you will workshop your statement. We will then do some talking to set up the sample writing that you will be working on for next week.

Overview for the rest of the term:
For the rest of the term you will be working on your portfolio (created through your Kean gmail site). The directions for the portfolio + the schedule for creating the different sections are available on the March 25 post of this blog. Tbe general procedure will be: class discussion of the piece you are working on, you then post your draft(s) on your blog, we work on the draft in class, and you then post your revised/final version on your portfolio.

For a working sample of the portfolio format - along with descriptions of what you will include on each page, see Chandler Portfolio.

For Thursday, you should post your revised introductory letter to your portfolio, and post your draft personal statement to your blog. Thursday's blog post should also include a list of the genres (kinds of writing) you will include as writing samples for your portfolio.

I have been in touch with each of you about your portoflio. I will be sending feedback on blogs by Thursday. I think I finally have the blog posts numbered correctly. Sorry for the confusion.

The schedule for the remaining presentations is as follows:

April 15: Lana - pre-school teacher; Andrea nursing

April 19: Walmbe - theater advertising; Michelle - elementary teacher

April 22: Matt lyric/song writer; Brian script writer;

April 26: Deborah - author Mario - teacher; Lauren - human resources

If you have any questions, let me know.


Blog 21: Post your draft personal statement + a list of the genres you will include in your writing samples.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Personal statements

So you might be getting the idea that one place to look for models and directions for most writing genres is the Purdue OWL.

For personal statements, check out:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/642/01/

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Class April 8

Homework:
Blog 20 (see below)
Post both completed resumes to your portfolio.

Also - in class Karilyn and Aydin will be presenting.

Make sure to send my the link to your portfolio (check it to make sure it works).

If you are just creating your portfolio you check out Sample portfolio. - you can use the menu on the left as a sample/template to organize your portfolio.

In class today Tim + Taylor gave their presentations on their vocations: history teacher + author.

We talked some more about the resumes you have been working on - and if we you exchanged documents & workshopped what you had so far.

I also talked about your assignment for Monday - an introductory letter. Depending on your profession, you may write:

A cover letter for a job application
A query letter about available positions
A query/overview for a piece of writing you want to submit for publication
Or some other kind of letter to put you into contact with individuals/businesses/institutions in your profession.

Blog 20: Introductory letter + a preliminary list of the kind of writing you will submit for the writing samples in your portfolio.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Class April 5

Before we talk about your resumes, we are going to talk about overall organization, features you will want to include - and how to develop them, and the use of headings + font to make a favorable presentation. You will then create your resume as a document and send a copy to me.
chcke out: sample resume

For Thursday:

Blog 19: post a resume for your "dream" job. It is OK to set goals (not yet accomplished qualifications) and include them on your resume in italics so I can tell them apart from what you've actually done. This "dream" resume will help you think about some of the training and experience you need to "fill in" before actually applying for the career of your choice.

Presenations will take place according to the following schedule. If your name is not on the list - send me an email to confirm a date. Your choices are for April 22, and for April 26.

April 8: Taylor - fiction author; Tim - history teacher

April 12: Karilyn- lawyer; Aydin - sports writer

April 15: Lana - pre-school teacher; Andrea nursing

April 19: Walmbe - theater advertising; Michelle - elementary teacher

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Class April 1

Today I gave a sample presentation - and we talked about resumes.

Important points to remember about resumes are that your resume:
1. needs to provide the information your prospective employer is looking for
2. will include headings or categories that reflect your particular profession
3. will have variable headings even within your profession
4. should be designed to cast you in the best possible light - even if it means writing a slightly non-standard document.

For Monday:
Write a draft resume for your chosen profession. Your resume should reflect both the expectations for your profession - and form & content that allows you to cast yourself and our accomplishments in the best possible light.

Blog 18: Describe the profession your resume was written for - and post your resume.

In class Monday you will workshop your resumes. After the workshop we will talk about how to tweak a general resume to make it work for a particular job.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Resumes

Resume links

These links are a place to start:

Purdue OWL
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/564/1/
Sample resumes http://www.bestsampleresume.com/


Some even better places to find sample resumes are at the websites of professionals – click on THEIR resumes - or ask someone you know.

You might discover that web-resumes are replacing traditional resumes For example, check out: http://danchaon.com/ or https://www.msu.edu/~devossda/index2.html.

Type in the names of people you know in the profession and see what you come up with.

Career presentation

Assignment: For your presentation on a career in writing, you will use the "I'm an English major - now what?" text as a starting place. You will supplement your research into career possibilities with the websites posted on our blog. During your presentation you will answer the following questions:

- What are the job descriptions in this profession?
- What kinds of writing do individuals in this profession do?
- How can you prepare yourself for this kind of writing profession?
- What resources are available to individuals who want to enter your profession?
- What are some of the obstacles?
- What are some creative ways to give yourself an “edge” for entering your profession?

SAMPLE PRESENTATION: TEACHING ENGLISH/WRITING AT THE POST-SECONDARY LEVEL
Description of the range of job descriptions for post-secondary English teachers
Subject material: As a college “professor” you can teach composition, business writing (writing in the professions), creative writing (poetry, fiction & creative nonfiction), or English literature.
Work setting: You can teach at a community college, a 4-year college, or a university (a 4-year school that offers graduate training).

Job title: Your job classification may be: tenure track, full-time nontenure track , or adjunct faculty.
Each of these
Credentials: For composition, professional writing & English literature, you will be expected to have a Ph. D. at the University & College level, and at least an M. A. at the Community College level. For creative writing, a Master of Fine Arts is the terminal degree.
Academic experience in research & teaching will help you get a job. As an undergraduate, working at a writing center, participating in student research projects, working on student publications, taking part in writing contests & conferences will set you up to get into graduate school. As a graduate student, fellowships, teaching assistantships, participation in conferences, and publications will help you get a job.

Job description:
Tenure-track faculty are expected to contribute to the development and life of the university where they work. They do so by contributing teaching, research, and service that reflects their interests and training.

Service: Tenure track faculty participate in designing and developing programs and courses in their Department and School; the serve on University, School, and Department committees to govern, plan, and create the university and its policies; they participate student advisement, sponsor student groups, and so on.

Teaching: Tenure track faculty generally teach some number of “service” courses – either introduction to literature, or the required composition courses plus courses in their area of specialty.

Research: Tenure track faculty are expected to participate in professional conferences (see for example) and they are expected to publish essays, book chapters, and/or book-length studies in their area of expertise. Professional journals include: College Composition & Communication, Computers and Composition, Composition Studies; Academic publishers include: Routledge, Sage; and NCTE - to mention only a few.

Full-time nontenure-track faculty and adjunct faculty are primarily expected to teach. They often teach entry level courses, but may have upper-level and graduate responsibilities depending on their training and expertise.

What kinds of writing do individuals in this profession do?
Teaching:
syllabus + calendar
course assigments and other course documents
feedback /communications/directions to students

Service
courses
meeting agendas
memos
program proposals
reports for accreditation
evaluations of courses, personnel, programs, etc
student letters of recommendation
grant proposals
policy statements
administrative practices
communications with colleagues

Research:
Notes/writing to gather information => develop ideas
Abstracts & proposals
Essays
Books
Reviews for articles, courses, articles, books
Conference participation - talks + abstracts for talks + programs
Grant proposals, reviews, and reports

How can you prepare yourself for this kind of writing?
The two most important moves to prepare yourself for academic writing are learning how to analyze & write in the form of a wide range of academic genres, and making connections with appropriate mentors and peers.

for teaching – use models from other teachers, books & websites on teaching, talk to your colleagues

for service – use models from the institution where you serve = this kind of writing really about following guidelines. Again, support + information from mentors will be key.

for your research - read journals and publications in your area and pattern your work on the materials you value. Write to editors, talk to published authors, ask colleagues to read your work.

And the very best way to prepare is - in tandem with reading samples of what you want to write - to write, write, write, and write some more. Joining a peer writing group or working with a writing center or studio can also be very helpful.

Professional organizations:
College Conference on Composition and Communication
National Council of Teachers of English
Association of Writing Programs (Kean University has a membership in this organization).
Modern Language Association
National Writing Project
Poets and Writers

Obstacles to entering the profession:
Competition for entry into high prestige graduate programs is high, as is competition for jobs at Colleges and Universities. Many Community Colleges now require applicants to have a Ph. D.

Hiring depends on openings. In general, it is easier to get a teaching job as a composition instructor than as a English literature instructor; and it is easier to find a job as adjunct faculty, than to find a job as a tenure-track faculty member. Also, the tenure process can be dangerous – there are high demands on time and energy to make your way through the process. It will not be a 40-hour per week job.

What are some creative ways to give yourself an “edge” for entering your profession?
Choose a graduate program with professors well known as mentors.
Choose a graduate program with a high success-rate for placing its graduates.
Take a course of study that prepares you in an area with “flexibility”; pay attention to patterns for hiring.
Go to professional conferences; if possible give a presentation.
Go to workshops.
Work on research projects with your professors; see if you can have several publications or works in progress by the time you are on the job market.
Join a writing group.
Get some teaching experience, either as a teaching assistant or through adjunct work.
Keep up with research in your area of interest. Volunteer to review articles, books for the journals you are most familiar with.
If possible, look into writing a grant proposal or working with a group to write a grant proposal.
Make sure to get enough exercise + recreation.
Don’t stress over writing a “perfect” dissertation – just get it finished.

Monday, March 29, 2010

March 29

We set up your portfolio sites. I created a sample site (https://sites.google.com/a/kean.edu/chandler_eng2020/)that you can use as a guide for the basic organization. We will be going back to this site as you add your assignments - so you will have plenty of opportunities to edit + revise.

We also created a schedule for presentations:

April 8: Taylor - fiction author; Tim - history teacher

April 12: Karilyn- lawyer; Aydin - sports writer

April 15: Lana - pre-school teacher; Andrea nursing

April 19: Walmbe - theater advertising; Michelle - elementary teacher

April 22: Lauren - human resources

On Thursday I will give a "sample" presentation on choosing a vocation in higher education (being a professor); we will spend the rest of class looking at formats for resumes + talking about how to write resumes for different professions.

Blog 17: In light of today's class discussion, keep working on your list of how to use writing in your profession; do some thnking about the particular writing you will include in this portfolio.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Class March 25

You gave yourself a grade for your process narrative and sent your discussion of that grade to me in an email. We developed a rubric where:

meeting requirements for the assignment = 40 pts
focus = 20 pts
organization = 20 pts
development = 15 pts
style = 5 pts

Total = 100 points

After you turned in your essays we discussed plans for the rest of the term including your presentation on a writing career and your final portfolio (see the two previous posts to this Blog).

Blog 16: Identify the writing career you would like to do your presentation on & begin to develop a list of the kinds of writing associated with that career.

In class Monday we will set the calendar for presentations on career choices, and we will take a first look at google.sites.

Assignment sheet for Portfolio + Presentation

Portfolio Assignment:

Purpose: to create a electronic portfolio that presents your writing for this course as well as writing samples for your chosen profession: to gain experience creating an electronic portfolio; to provide evidence of your growth as a writer.

Description of assignment: For the remainder of the term you will work on creating a practice portfolio. This portfolio will include the kinds of writing that you might make available to prospective employers. It will also document work you’ve done for this course. Your portfolio should include the following:
• Introduction (on the home page) where you identify yourself, your goals as a writer, provide background for the pieces included in your portfolio.
• Resume – general: a boiler-plate resume; this resume should include relevant courses work experience and references to writing samples that demonstrate your preparation for a position in the field of your choice.
• Resume for a particular position in your chosen profession: this resume should include relevant courses work experience and references to writing samples that demonstrate your preparation for a that position. This resume should name the employer + the position you would write it for.
• Introductory letter: to accompany the resume for a particular position
• Personal statement: (appropriate for your chosen profession)
• Reflective writing on resumes: a discussion of gaps between your preparation and the career you hope to enter along with a plan for how to fill those gaps.
• Writing samples appropriate to your chosen profession: Three (3) documents in genres you will use for your profession. There may be some variation to this requirement depending on your profession; for example, if you are a poet , you should include 3 sets of 3-4 poems (the number of poems often requested for a submission to a journal).
• Reflective analysis of your writing samples
• Literacy narrative
• Process narrative
Individual assignment sheets will provide direction for the different sections. We will work together in class to learn how to use google.sites to create an online portfolio.

Timeline/due dates:
March 29: Your focus/career for your portfolio + identify preliminary list of writing genres to submit with your portfolio
April 5: Workshop general resume
April 8: Workshop particular resume
April 12: Workshop introductory letter
April 15: Final listing of writing genres for writing samples in your portfolio + workshop personal statement
April 19: Workshop 2 short pieces for your portlio writing samples
April 22: Workshop longer writing samples
April 26: Workshop longer writing samples
April 29: Reflective analysis of writing samples
May 3: Complete portfolio due


Presentation on writing career:
For your presentation on a career in writing, you will use the "I'm an English major - now what?" text as a starting place. You will supplement your research into career possibilities with the websites posted on our blog. During your presentation you will answer the following questions:
Describe the range of job descriptions in your profession have.
What kinds of writing do individuals in this profession do?
How can you prepare yourself for this kind of writing?
What resources are available to individuals who want to enter your profession?
What are some of the obstacles?
What are some creative ways to give yourself an “edge” for entering your profession?

Possibilities for your work as a writer


Job Search Engines & Lists

Altavista
http://careers.av.com (job search and career advice)

CareerPath.com & Career Builder
http://www.careerpath.com - http://www.careerbuilder.com

Craig’s List for North Jersey
http://newjersey.craigslist.org/

Kforce.com
http://kforce.com

Monster.com
http://www.monster.com

Government jobs
http://www.usajobs.gov/

The Write Job
http://www.writejobs.com/

Writing Careers
http://jobs.poewar.com/

Notforprofits + Americorps
Americorps
http://www.americorps.gov/

Center for Non-Profit Corporations
http://www.njnonprofits.org/

The Chronicle of Philanthropy
http://philanthropy.com/section/Jobs/224/


For Teaching
Education Week on the Web
http://www.edweek.org/jobs

The Chronicle of Higher Education
http://chronicle.com/jobs/

The Academie Position Network
http://www.apnjobs.com

American Association of Community College
http://www.aacc.nche.edu

Higher Education Jobs
http://www.higheredjobs.com

Recruitment for Private School Teaching
Carney, Sandoe & Associates
http://www.carneysandoe.com

The Education Group
http://www.educationgroup.com

Educational Resources Group
http://www.ergteach.com

Independent Educational Services
http://www.ies-search.org

International School Services
http://www.iss.edu

For Freelancers
Guru.com
http://www.guru.com

Elance
http://elance.com

Freelance writing jobs
http://www.freelancewriting.com/freelance-writing-jobs.php


Career Advice
AWP's Articles & Advice for Writers
Ask the Headhunter
http://www.asktheheadhunter.com (news and advice on the web for job seekers)

The Riley Guide
http://www.rileyguide.com

Tips for applying for jobs
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/681/01/



\

Monday, March 22, 2010

Class Monday March 22

WORKSHOP!!!!

You worked with a writing partner (or me) to revise your draft process narrative. We used the following procedure.

Authors began by stating the conceptual focus for their essays. This is not a blow by blow of what they presented in the body of the essay = but rather a synthetic statement of what their process is and how it sets them up as a writer. For instance, a focus might be " I have a once-through process that was good for me in high school because it allowed me to write a lot of papers fairly quickly that didn't necessarily go into really deep thinking. At the same time, as I am going through college, I am realizing I have to do some more critical thinking - and that I need to use writing like Peter Elbow was saying - to "cook" or find ideas - and I don't do that. Also a once-through process is sort of hard for long essays - or essays where I don't know what I am writing about before I start."

This kind of complex statement of your focus is your introduction. It sets up the ideas the rest of your essay will SHOW - through a discussion of your process.

Next authors stated the points they used to develop/illustrate this focus. Make a list! Think about whether it is the best order.

The workshop partners - listened & asked questions if there were any points they didn't understand.

The authors then read their essays - taking time to highlight/bold points they wanted to work on.

When the authors were finished reading, the workshop partners asked about any points they didn't understand - and pointed out what was working. Both partners then worked together on focus, organization + development.

Due at the beginning of class on Thursday
Blog 15:
Final process narrative.

In class you will read classmates essays + grade your own essay.
I will also set up the remainder of the course - which is for you to work on developing a portfolio for the writing career of your choice.

Hope you had a great break - and see you Thursday.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Assignment over break

Revise your process narrative in light of comments from your classmates. I will be sending you some feedback - probably toward the end of break.

Blog 14: Post your revised literacy narrative. Use the feedback from your classmates. Try to use all 4 types of revisions.

On Monday, March 21 you will have another workshop on your process narrative. This time you will give your narrative a grade based on the assignment sheet - and then work with a classmate - reading your essay aloud - to address work on improving any areas that need work.

Your final draft for the process narrative will be due Thursday, March 25.

Have a great break!

Guidelines for workshop

What kind of feedback to your essay would help you the most?
Content:
State the overall focus the narrative.
List the points with respect to that focus.
Does the essay include included (quote/indicate where):
- characterization of the overall writing process
- analysis of variations in writing process
- reflection on the strengths and weaknesses
- plans for future as a writer

Organization:
Where did you find the focus (state it)
List the sequencing of points
Note connections between points & overall focus
Where is the reflective discussion of “the on-going evolution of your process”?
Does ther essay have a satisfactory conclusion? State it.

Development:
list detailed examples
which points do these examples connect to?

For class March 11

Today you will be workshopping your literacy narratives. Post them to your blog so classmates can respond.

Sorry for the late update. I have been under the weather and am just now starting to feel human.

The object of today's workshop is to set you up to finish your process narrative over the break. See you in class.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

March 4

Today we talked about writing academic summaries and the difference between stating back a shortened form of all that was said (one kind of summary) and identifying characteristics or concepts that are shared by the different points or anecdotes in an essay. We discussed how re-telling the story of "Young Goodman Brown" - about how he goes into the woods and talks to a stranger and has strange visions and is led to an alter and hears voices and then wakes up in the woods the next morning and goes back to his home a changed man - is NOT what your literature teachers will be looking for as a summary of the text. They will want you to point out what the story is ABOUT. "Young Goodman Brown" is about questioning (and losing) one's faith.

Academic writing values "abstraction" => identifying the ideas + generalizations that run through and beneath the texts you read.

For the introductions to your literacy narratives - I wanted you to identify the concepts/ideas that were the center of your experience. I was looking for a focus that discussed those ideas/concepts - the "what it is about" or "what did it mean" of your story. I will be returning your essays with grades and comments as soon as I finish this post.

For the rest of class we discussed Dennis Baron's essay "From Pencils to Pixels" - and more importantly - we discussed what it means that this process takes place when new technologies displace old ones. We talked about the "why" and the "how"(about how individuals learn literacy practices at a certain age etc.) and thought about what it means that it happens again and again - in cycles - and what it means that we are in an age of particularly rapidly changing technology. This will have consequences for all of our futures as writers. We are going to need to be prepared to keep up - to embrace the new language and ideas that accompanies the new technologies - and at the same time to keep a perspective (we didn't get to that part of the discussion because we ran out of time).

We then talked about your process narrative (looked at the assignment sheet again) and discussed what kind of writing you are going to need to do in order to get started on this. I will be responding to your blogs Saturday AM - I will read what's posted at that time.

For Monday:
Read: Charney, "The Effect of Hypertext on Processes of Reading and Writing" (you might see some influences on your composing process in here).

Blog 13: Post a one sentence concept summary of Charney. Then write five or six short sentences to identify the main ideas she develops with respect to that concept.

Keep in mind that the draft for your process essay is due for Thursday, March 11.

Have a good weekend and see you Monday.

Monday, March 1, 2010

In-class writing + Blog 12 + what we did in class March 1

In class you sent me an email that answered 3 questions about your final literacy narrative:

1. what did you change? (what revisions did you make to the draft that you turned in last week)
2. how did you address the changes I suggested in my comments? (what did you change in response to my comments)
3. what grade would you give your final essay and why? (what do you still need to work on).

After you completed your email - you worked on Blog 12.

Blog 12: describe how you made the changes to your literacy narrative that you listed in the email as answers to questions 1 & 2.


We then talked through Peter Elbow's chapters on "growing" + "cooking" and you did some more talking about writing process.

For Class Thursday, March 4:
Read: Baron, p 70, in Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook. Baron is concerned primarily with how computer technology changed writing. As you read - think about how Web 2.0 is continuing to change writing. This essay was written before widespread use of blogs, before facebook, before google was available for public use, youtube, wikipedia, before twitter . . .

Also - come to class prepared to work on your process narrative. Use your reflections on your revising process for your literacy narrative. Also - you can use notes on your invention process for this essay - as an "example" of how you gather information/get ideas.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Class February 25

The University will be closed beginning at 3:15 today.

With respect to our class: I will be in class for those of you who drove to campus before the announcement and anyone else who shows up. I will not take attendance or penalize anyone in any way for not attending class today. At the same time - if you want some one-on-one coaching for your literacy narrative, or if you want a head start on working on your process narrative and you are already here - this would be a good time to get some work done.

For Monday:
Read Elbow Chapters 2 & 3 (growing + cooking). We will talk about both chapters together. We will also do some in-class writing on your process essay using your posts for Blogs 10 & 11 - so make use of the space to write. These notes should be observations of how you write.

Blog 11: Post detailed notes on your writing process

Final Literacy narratives are due, as attachments, by class Monday, March 1 in my email: ENG2020writing@gmail.com.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Class February 22

Today you looked over the comments to your literacy narratives and did some freewriting to your focus. We talked over Elbow's theories about why/how freewriting works. It can be used to break the habit of excessive, premature editing, as well as to make a connection to half-conscious, partially realized ideas. The exercise we did in class was "focused freewriting" which allows you to associate to (or not) a particular set of ideas, and in that way - deepen + explore what you might write; I described how focused freewriting could be connected to "looping" - a process where you select a set of new, interesting, or related ideas from your freewrite and then do additional freewriting to deepen your exploration of those topics.

Revised (final) literacy narratives are due, Monday, March 1.

In addition to discussing Elbow and working on your revisions to you literacy narratives, we talked through the assignment sheet for the essay on your writing process (posted on the previous blog).

For Wednesday:

Read: Elbow, Ch. 2, "Growing"
Blog 10: Post some detailed notes on your writing process. You can describe the step-by-step process you used to work on the literacy narrative (including the class assignments). You might look at differences between the pre-writing, first draft, and final draft you posted on your blog as evidence of what you did.

If you want to document your step by step process for writing - you might compose your next essay using google.docs (I can show you how to do this in class if you are not familiar with it). These documents not only show the 'final product', they also track the sequence of changes you make as you write. Work on your document for a while. You need to save your document as you work (after you make significant revisions). After you reach a point where you want to look at your patterns for writing, save your document, then click "file" => and choose "see revision history" from the dropdown list. This will give you a list of links to the sequential documents at the "save" points you created as you were writing. It can be pretty interesting.

Assignment sheet for Process Narrative

Reflecting on your Writing Process

Purpose
This assignment provides an opportunity to document and analyze your writing process. The purpose of this work is to prompt you to actively WATCH what you do as you write and to reflect on how and why you produce writing. These reflections will enable you to: characterize your different processes for writing; identify your strengths and challenges as a writer; and become aware of possibilities for writing “differently”.

Description of the assignment
Write an essay to analyze and reflect on how you create writing for the different rhetorical purposes you confront in your life. You are doing lots of writing this term that will serve as evidence for your process. You may choose to describe your practices for writing: notes, conversations, brainstorming documents, and successive drafts, and final documents written for a range of purposes. Descriptions of the social, interactive practices (such as talking to friends, going to forums, surfing the net, listening to music, etc) are also important to this characterization. To produce the evidence necessary for this essay, take notes on how you write long assignments (like this one), writing you do for your own purposes (chats, updating your facebook, notes to friends), and any other kind of writing that is important to your life.

Based on this evidence you will create a coherent essay where you present: a focused characterization of your overall process; a description of differences in how you write for different purposes, reflections on the strengths and difficulties in your various processes, and a plan for how/what you want to change about your process.

Criteria
A series of statements to characterize your practices during each part of the writing process
Detailed observations/descriptions to support or “prove” your claims about “how” you write
Discussion of variations/distinctions in how you write for different audiences, purposes, and genres
Discussion of how/whether your writing process is changing
Reflections on which parts of your writing process are working and which are not so effective
Synthetic conclusion that observes the strengths in your process, notes how your process is changing, and sets up goals for strengthening your writing habits (and considers the reality factor of whether you will actually change)

Form:
Introduction that characterizes your writing process in a general way
Specific discussion (supported by examples and illustrations) to describe each part of your writing process, as well as how your process is different within different rhetorical situations
Reflective discussion on the on-going evolution of your process
Conclusion that sets up a plan for your future writing process

Length: suitable for in-depth development of your material, minimum 5 pages.

Due dates:
Documentation of your writing process: Blog 6, Blog 10 (2/22); Blog 11 (2/25)
Draft Process essay: March 11
Due Final New Literacy Narrative: March 22

Friday, February 19, 2010

February 19

We started class with a workshop on your literacy narratives. We reviewed the criteria for the essay as stated on the assignment sheet and created a list to guide you in assessing & providing feedback for your classmate's literacy narratives. You were divided in groups (each of you were to leave feedback for 3 or 4 of your classmates).

Groups
Michelle, Tim, Andrea, Deborah;
Aydin, Taylor, Math, Brian;
Karilyn Mario, Lana, Saran, Walmbi.

Please finish commenting to all your group members so everyone gets some feedback.

After you read for a while I interrupted you (as usual) and asked you what you were thinking (if anything) about your own essay. Most of you indicated that by reading your classmates' work (and from reviewing the requirements for the assignment) you now had some ideas about how to strengthen your essays - so we decided you could revise them.

We did some talking about what each of you thought you needed to do to strengthen your essays.

Some of the main areas for work were:

FOCUS
Finding or choosing a focus.

Choosing "stories" that are more relevant to and that develop the focus

Developing more discussion of how the stories connect to the focus

Making sure each paragraph of the essay developed that focus (in a slightly different way)

ORGANIZATION
Making sure the introduction sets up the focus - and that the conclusion comes back to that focus

Deciding on a logical organization - chronological, by theme, by "causality". . . so that one paragraph/literacy story leads to the next in a way that develops a coherent discussion of your focus

Creating transitions and connections between sections + paragraphs

DEVELOPMENT
Making sure to include details that "show" rather than "state" your points.

Including connections between your stories and your focus

We also discussed (briefly) some of the writing strategies you might use as you worked in each of these three areas for revision>

To find your focus:
- read what you have written and notice or underline repeating themes/words/ideas
- list the ideas in each paragraph in the margin
- if you don't find the focus you want in what you have written - freewrite, or do some focused freewriting where you develop material related to an idea that you like
- do some random listing or list ideas associated with one of the items on another list
- talk to someone about your ideas
- write about what you think you want to say (but promise yourself no one else will read this writing)

To work on organization:
- state the main point of each paragraph in your essay in the margin (you can move them around)
- make an outline
- say your essay aloud to yourself and write down the main points in the order you say them
- list all the points you want to include - then move them around

DEVELOPMENT
- freewrite or do some association for the places where you need more material
- talk to someone about what you've written
- list materials you might use to develop a particular section
- surf the net or read material that might give you ideas

For this weekend - take a break from this essay. I will give you some feedback on Monday, and the revised essays will be due a week from Monday = March 1.


We spent the rest of class talking about "The Ethnography of Literacy". The main point was that we cannot make useful generalizations about what literacy is or how it works without considering the texts, contexts, functions, participants, and motivations that are involved. Szwed emphasizes that there is no single way to write or to learn to write, and that we need to study the multiple ways of reading and writing within the contexts where they take place.

We then considered how theories about reading and writing (our assumptions about how it is defined, practiced, and evaluated) influence educational and political practices.

For Monday:
Read: Elbow, Introduction (xi - xxxi) + the first chapter on freewriting (1-11).
Blog 9: What are Elbow's assumptions about what writing is and how it works?

Thursday, February 11, 2010

What we did in class February 11

Today we talked over the main points in Scribner and Coles' essay and reviewed the theories set forward in the earlier essays, and then you did some writing to pull together the main ideas we've covered so far.

The main points of our discussion of the readings (as copied from the board)
ONG:
writing changes the way we think by
- improving memory
- improving reasoning in terms of complexity + logic
- increasing accuracy

Scribner & Cole
writing inhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif itself does not change thinking=> the way writing affects thinking depends on the particular writing system, how it is used, how it is learned and what "skills" it entails.

Aaron & Joshi
writing is a human propensity set up by human biolgoy; writing and speech complement one another - as opposed to =writing being a phonological representation of speech.

New Literacy Narratives
The ways we use, learn, and define writing are embedded in cultural stories = social constructivist vies


Other observations:
- communication (writing) takes place in and is defined by communities
- our education system demands that everyone communicate int he same way
- there are lots of legitimate ways to communicate
- people in power get to say what is "good" communication.

For Blog 7 you answered two questions:
1) What new ways to think about writing did you learn from these readings? and 2) what are your theories about writing?

For Thursday:
Blog 8: Post your completed literacy narrative. Also turn it in to ENG2020writing@gmail.com as an attachment.

Read: "The Ethnography of Literacy" p 421 in Literacy.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Class Monday February 8

We talked over the requirements for this assignment, and what you would have to do to meet those requirements. You then read and commented on classmates' draft literacy narratives. We closed class with a discussion where you each commented on what you would need to do to revise and finish your drafts. Good class!

Keep working on your literacy narratives. If you want to schedule a conference with me to talk through your revisions - send me an email at ENG2020writing@gmail.com. The final draft is due February 18.

For Thursday:
Read: Scribner & Cole (p. 123 in Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook)
Blog 6: Post your notes on your writing process (to get ready for your next assignment). Include the writing you did for the prompts on Jan 28 + Feb 4 + any notes/observations you might have gathered as you worked on your draft and began to revise.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Blogs

I have finished reading through your blogs and will be sending you the grades in a minute. I have decided you will get full credit for the first post - just for having turned it in. I think I didn't do sufficient teaching to set you up to do the kind of job I was hoping for - so you can kind of read through my comments and look at the grade, and then know that if you turned it in you got full credit => just for doing the work.

The purpose of blogs (as I wrote in some of your comments) is to demonstrate your engagement with the readings (so you won't need to do quizzes, or tests, or papers); also, I strongly believe that writing is a form a learning and I see writing a blog as a way to have you process these readings both with your eyes and your bodies (hands, movement etc). I also think it is a good thing to have your ideas out there so you can see how the rest of the class is doing.

Hope you are having a good time with your literacy narratives - and I will see you on Monday.

Note: Mario, if you send an email to ENG2020writing@gmail.com, I will reply with comments on your blog. I do not have an email address for you.

Friday, February 5, 2010

Blogs

I have sent my comments/evaluation to your in-class blog posts on your themes for your literacy narrative + your notes on your writing process so far.

I will be grading blogs 1-3 on Saturday. Check your email for feedback + questions and enjoy the snow!

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Class February 4

You did some writing on the "theme" or focus for your literacy narrative, and then you listed some stories that you would want to include to support that theme. You posted this writing on your blog (labeled as Blog 4) - and by sometime late tomorrow (Friday) I hope to give you some feedback about how you are doing in terms of the assignment.

You also did some writing - made some notes on your writing process for this project => as evidence of a particular experience composing a particular essay. I expect that you will use memories of other experiences writing papers, stories, poems, letters, emails, etc - that will provide different kinds of evidence of how you write. You also posted this to your blog - and labeled it as Blog 4.

I will be looking over the rest of your posts this weekend to give you feedback. Specifically I will be reading/grading:

Blog 1: Post your understanding of the main points from your sections of Aaron & Joshi. This is NOT supposed to be an essay / finished writing => these are reading notes and will not be evaluated based on grammar, spelling or style. I will be looking for evidence that you grappled with the ideas in this reading. Also write down questions - and words you may not be sure of.

Blog 2: respond to the following prompts:

What factors represented as influencing our relationships to written language in the essay on cultural stories?

What can we learn about writing from biological-linguistic perspectives and theories? What can we learn about writing from social linguistic perspectives and the analysis of new literacy narratives?

Blog 3: Sum up your understanding of Ong's main points.

We spent the rest of class discussing Ong (see the previous blog for Dr. Chandlers Spark notes on this article). These are some complicated ideas - and I realize I come across with strong opinions - but the truth is many of these ideas are far from being clearly "right" or "wrong" in the empirical sense. If you think back over the different theories about writing we have read so far - already it is apparent that contemporary scholars have different ideas about how writing works, what it is, and what it does.

For Monday:
Blog 5: Post your draft for your literacy narrative.

We will spend class workshopping your draft essays. The more you write - the more you will have to work with. I am really looking forward to reading your writing!

Have a great weekend and see you Monday!

My notes on Ong

vocabulary
noetic= of or relating to intellect (of the mind)
chirographic = associated with handwriting
mnenonic = assisting the memory

Page 19: main points
1.within high-technology cultures, literacy is essential and presents itself as “natural”
2.illiteracy is often thought of as the lack of a simple mechanical skill (like tying one’s shoes, or driving a car) => this is an incorrect understanding of language
3.we think in terms of writing & for the most part we are unaware of how writing shapes our thought

page 20
1.literate individuals have a fused awareness of words both as what they stand for (or signify) and the written symbols used to represent them (what is signified) [for more discussion of the two parts of words see Semiotics for Beginners http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
2. oral cultures use formulaic structures as mnemonic devises
3.exploratory thinking is difficult and infrequent in oral cultures

page 21
Ong reviews Plato’s characterization of writing in Phaedrus http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/phaedrus.html - and discusses parallels between Plato’s criticisms of writing/books and modern criticisms of computer technologies
summary of plato’s charges against writing
1. writing is inhuman (an object) and cannot be what in fact can only exist in the human mind
2. written texts are unresponsive
3. writing weakens memory
4. the written word cannot defend itself/speak

page 22
Ong points out the irony/failure of Plato’s argument by pointing out that “[Plato’s] philosophically analytic thought, including his analysis of the effects of writing, wass possible only because of the effects that writing [has] on mental processes. We know that totally oral peoples. . .are incapable of the protracted, intensive linear analysis that we have from Plato’s Socrates.

Section III: sets forward Ong’s statement /proof that writing, like computers – is a technology.

Section IV: writing ensures endurance – and creates “potential s far outdistancing those of the simply spoken word” (23)

Page 23
native speakers regularly use their spoken languge without knowledge of its grammar
argues that not everyone learns to write (eg. Ong does not embrace theories that written language is as biologically based as spoken language) => writing is artificial in a way that speech is not
writing is a usesful technology that is artificial and exterior - it allows us distance from our thought

page 24 - 29
Section VII - identifies influences of writing on thought

1. writing separates the known from the knower (allows you to see your thoughts outside of your self). . .”Between knower and known writing interposes a visible and tangible object, the text” (25).

2. writing separated interpretation of data from the data themselves

3. writing distances the word from the sound => translates aural to visual (according to biological theories this is NOT the case; biological theories would state that writing translates THOUGHT not aural sounds into visual signifiers)

4. writing allows communication to take place when communicants are physically separated

5. writing allows meanings to move across and away from the places where they were created (can place a record of talk in a new context)

6. because writing loses so the meanings provided by the contexts attached to talk – it has become more “precise” => or at least has a need to provide more background, content etc than spoken language

7. writing separates past from present

8. writing created “administration” => the abstract structures for organizing/governing groups (Scribner and Cole disagree with this claim – as well as many other claims made by Ong)

9. writing makes it possible to separate logic from persuasion (allows for a higher more complex degree of abstraction(many language theorists disagree with this)

10. writing separates academic learning from wisdom (this makes no sense to me)

11. writing creates dominant versus non-dominant, mainstream versus nonmainstream ways for communicating (new literacies scholars + many social language theorists disagree with this)

12. writing creates “grapholects” => written dialects like academic writing, texting conventions etc

13. writing moves thought toward the rational (left hemisphere of the brain) and away from the felt, intuitive, imagistic (right hemispher of the brain) –what do you think?

14. writing has made philosophic thought possible (again, scribner and cole disagree with this vigorously)

page 29 – 30
Section VIII: in this section Ong draws parallels between how writing changed thinking – and how the computer is “doing it again”

XI final point (30-31)
computer technologies can correct for the bias and “chirographic squint” that writing imposes

=> in plain English: the increased distance imposed by computer technologies can allow for increased reflection (a better chance at the big picture) which will allow us to recover the “full meaning” available interpersonal

Monday, February 1, 2010

Class February 1

Today we talked about a new literacies approach to theorizing writing; in this discussion we talked about social constructivism => an approach where language, knowledge, and social structures are viewed as products of human interactions. Mostly, we talked about stories - cultural stories => especially mainstream stories associated American identities: stories about independence, freedom, equality and success through hard work. We also talked about typical stories associated with literacies: stories about being a "hero", a 'rebel hero," a prodigy, or a struggling student. We also listed literacies and genres of writing that are valued/not valued in these stories and by our culture. This discussion was both to provide a basis for talking about social - as opposed to biological- theories of writing, and as a way for you to start thinking about how you might identify and reflect on a group of stories for your literacy narrative.

We then took a look at the assignment sheet for the literacy narrative (again) and talked about the criteria. Your first draft will be due a week from today, so at this point you should be generating lots of stories - and then looking at them for themes and thinking about what cultural stories your representations of your self connect to. As you notice how your stories reflect cultural identities/values/stories - you might ask your self how or why you "fell into" or chose the particular representations or impressions that are the basis for your talk about writing.

For Wednesday:
Read: Walter Ong's "Writing is a technology" on p 19 in Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook.

Blog 3: Sum up your understanding of Ong's main points.

I will be reading your blogs over the weekend and giving you some feedback on how you are doing with your posts. If you have not yet posted to the first two prompts - do so before Thursday and we will start from there.

See you next class.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

What we did in class January 28

What we did in class:
1. You added the link lists to your blogs. Your assignment for today was to make your first post to your blog. I looked around at your blogs and some of you haven't posted your thoughts/comments yet - so I am going to keep checking back - but I won't comment on your post until after class Monday. For those of you who didn't post Blog 1 (your response to the Aaron + Joshi essay), if you post over the weekend I will read it and give you credit + some feedback.

2. After setting up the link list - you told each other some literacy "stories" - anecdotes about experiences with reading, writing & technology that contributed to or "shaped" your relationship to literacies. Begin writing these stories down. They are your evidence for your literacy narrative.

3. I also asked you to pay attention to the process you are using to gather material, plan and reflect on your literacy narrative project. Your second writing project will be to write a detailed description of your writing process. Jot down your observations about how you write - for this class and for other classes. What do you do? Do you re-read the assignment sheet? Do you write in parts - or wait until the deadline? Do you do any brainstorming? What kind? Do you get stuck? Where? For this project, are you writing to the prompts? Are you using the time in class - or is the in-class writing just annoying? The point of this observation and reflection is to provide you with some observations of what you actually do as you develop writing - rather requiring you to "remember". It is important to actually watch yourself, since what you remember may be shaped more by a story about what you are supposed to do - than what you actually do.

4. We then had a discussion about how the stories we tell about literacy are as much cultural stories as they are stories about our individual experiences. This is because there are powerful attitudes and conventions that control which stories will be valued, and which stories will not. Within a diverse culture like ours - there are many conflicting stories, and some groups stories have more power than others. I gave the example of how - in 21st century U.S.- internet geeks + gamers' literacies are not valued; there are multiple movies about immature, irresponsible male characters who live with their parents and play video games; and the general American attitude is that video games are a waste of time = but reading a book is "good for you".

5. We then had a (short) discussion of Aaron + Joshi's discussion of writing as a "natural" human behavior similar to language. The central question was whether writing is simply a representation of spoken language - or whether it is a way of thinking/communicating that has evolved as related but different human characteristic. We made it through the description of the evolution of writing - which seemed to support independent system for expressing thought hypothesis (but they may have selected their facts to support their position?)

We also talked about the fact that both written and spoken communications systems seem to develop to meet the specific needs/uses within the culture where it comes into being. As if communication - both writing + language - evolves to solve a problem.

For Monday:
1. Read the hand out on new literacy narratives I gave you in class. If you were not in class - there are some extra copies in my mailbox (CAS 301E).

2. Post to your blog. Label this post Blog 2,
and respond to the following prompts:

What factors represented as influencing our relationships to written language in the essay on cultural stories?

What can we learn about writing from biological-linguistic perspectives and theories? What can we learn about writing from social linguistic perspectives and the analysis of new literacy narratives?

Blog list

Andrea http://andrean930.blogspot.com/
Aydin reyhanwriting.blogspot.com
Brian http://epikimage.blogspot.com/
Deborah http://nausicaathewaterbird.blogspot.com/
Karilyn keanstudent2.blogspot.com
Lauren http://Lauren-ilovetodream.blogspot.com
Mario royalwriting.blogspot.com
Matt thebackrent.blogspot.com
Michelle http://michelled-english2020.blogspot.com
Svitlana http://lanaenglish2020.blogspot.com/
Taylor http://taylorrbrown.blogspot.com/
Tim http://tfsblog-tim.blogspot.com/2010/01/tfsblog.html
Walmbegan http://boyylondon.blogspot.com

Monday, January 25, 2010

January 25

In class today we read through the assignment sheet for the literacy narrative, previewed your writing assignment for Thursday, and you set up your blogs.

In looking through the literacy narrative assignment, I emphasized that you are supposed to use writing in a particular way for the creation of this assignment. That is - you are supposed to do a great deal of "freewriting" or associating to the prompts - jotting down your experiences with literacy (everything you can remember) => and then use that writing as evidence. After you have lots of writing (data) - we will do some group work & one-on-one work to figure out the themes in your literacy experiences. From there you will begin to map out an essay that explores who you are as a writer - and how and why you got to be that writer (and whether you would like to be a different kind of writer).

We also talked about discourse - and discourse communities. We will talk more about this later, but for now - discourses are sets of (often unconscious) assumptions, values and beliefs about how to BE (including how to write and speak). Different groups usually have identifiable discourses.

For the Aaron and Joshi reading - we used a divide an conquor strategy. We will all read and be prepared to talk about the introduction, the history of writing & the general description of the three theoretical approaches. After that -
the back row = macroevolutionary theory, pp 274 - 283
middle students on my right + back row on left = microevolutionary perspective 283-94
front students on my right = the language as interactive perspective, pp 295-301

At the end of class you set up your blog, and sent me a link to your blog. I will check the links - and if they don't work I will get back to you by email.

Good class today. Your early experiences with literacy raised a lot of important factors that shape us as literacy learners: relationships to family & peers; the role of school as a model + cultural expectation; how play and good feelings influenced us, and more. You might add to this list (jot memories down as they come to you) randomly or systematically (hmmm - that will mean something too).

For Thursday:
Read: Written Language is as Natural as Spoken Language: A Biolinguistic Perspective by Aaron & Joshi

Blog 1: Post your understanding of the main points from your sections of the assigned reading. This is NOT supposed to be an essay / finished writing => these are reading notes and will not be evaluated based on grammar, spelling or style. I will be looking for evidence that you grappled with the ideas in this reading. Also write down questions - and words you may not be sure of. There are big ideas in this reading, and there are some big words - but it is big theory - and really cool.

Remember that the internet is there to help you find definitions for words you don't know. To save you some trouble, I've started a list of words that might make this a hard read.

genotype "is the genetic constitution of a cell, an organism, or an individual." (how it's made)

phenotype "is any observable characteristic or trait of an organism" (how it looks)

syntax = word order

phonology = the study of the sounds associated with language

morphology = the study of forms

orthography = study of the way writing is presented for interpretation

ontogeny = the sequence of development of a particular organism. This essay refers to the ontogeny of languguage - meaning the development of language by a particular speaker

phylogeny = the sequence of changes undergone in speciation => when one organism evolves into a different organism. In this essay when they refer to the phylogeny of language they are implying similar relationships and evolutionary relationships as one language evolves into another.

deep structure + universal grammar (layman's definition) = what we automatically know about language because we are human

Thursday, January 21, 2010

What we really did in class

Important correction: The email address for the course was listed on the course calendar as ENG2020@gmail.com => this is the wrong address. The correct address is:

ENG2020writing@gmail.com

Please re-send your message for homework - and sorry for the mix-up.

We talked through the syllabus (with a little discussion of the calendar) and you got to know one another.

I appreciated you sharing your writing - and I am excited working with you.

For Monday:
1. Order your books

2. Buy a flash drive if you don't have one + bring it to class

3. Send an email to me at ENG2020writing@gmail.com. Write from the email address you will use for this class (see directions on course syllabus). In this email, ask any questions that you might have forgotten to ask in class - and let me know if you have any suggestions or comments.

In class you will set up your blog, we will go over the assignment sheet for your first writing project - and youwill do some invention writing for that project.

Have a great weekend and see you Monday.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

First day of class

Welcome to ENG 2020: Writing!

Today we are going to get to know each other a little bit, do some writing, and look through the syllabus & calendar.

Send me an email from the email address you will use for this class (see directions on course syllabus). In this email, ask any questions that you might have forgotten to ask in class - and let me know if you have any suggestions or comments.

Welcome - and I am looking forward to reading your writing.